Evolution Or Creation. By R W Hayes.

July 1991.

No! I do not believe that life here on earth is as a result of evolution. I've never believed that, but I do believe that anyone who has taught or believes such nonsense is not only deceived, he or she is not using or has not used their God given intelligence at all.

I ask you, how is this evolution supposed to have started? We are told that sunlight on some muddy pools or the seas or oceans was sufficient to start life. Where are the ingredients for this miracle soup supposed to have come from, because although I am not the least bit scientific, I know for a certain fact that NOTHING CAN BE MADE FROM NOTHING.

Perhaps you believe that the earth and all other stars and planets came about because of the `big bang' theory and therefore there must have been elements floating in these pools of water, and this started the life cycle, WHAT WATER. If there ever was such a thing as the `big bang' then you can be assured that the heat would have been so intense that there would not have been a drop, NOT ONE DROP, of moisture anywhere.

Ah! but, millions of years later it must have rained, you say. Then where did the rain bearing clouds come from? Are we supposed to believe they just evolved like everything else? If that is what you believe then you had better start praying to someone because if rain clouds (or anything for that matter) can just appear of their own accord, then they can disappear for the same reason, and then watch out. Not only are clouds necessary to sustain life as we know it, but so is the air, the moon, the sun, the trees, the seas, the tides, the sand on the beaches etc. etc. etc. Do you really believe that ALL of this is by accident ?

Let's just suppose these rain bearing clouds HAD appeared, out of all this chaos, millions of years after the `big bang'. Tell me, what held them in place within the earths atmosphere? Gravity you say, WHAT GRAVITY and where did it come from? Then one has to ask of course, where did the indescribably huge mass of rock, earth and elements which formed the nucleus of the `big bang' come from in the first place? 

Are we supposed to believe that by some vague, undefined and unproven process, we should think that everything there is on earth now, exists because some low form of life evolved into the millions of types of fishes, birds, animals, insects and MAN that we have and know of today. How absurd. And we haven't even considered the plant life. Are we supposed to believe that when this life did emerge from the seas and oceans that plant life was already growing for these lifeforms to eat? Where did the seed come from? Perhaps it blew in during a storm. How laughable.


Listen to the naturalists on TV, they will tell you, when describing any area, `it has taken hundreds and even thousands of years to achieve this fine balance between animal and plant life'. (And the majority of naturalists and scientists are evolutionists) This fine balance, according to them, is necessary for the survival of both animal and plant life. They are ALL dependant on each other.

Evolutionists would have us believe that, IN THE BEGINNING, this `fine balance' was immediate. That regardless of which species it was that emerged first, the right type of food in the right quantities, must have been ready and waiting for it. Then as time went by and the animal (species) decided to change itself, the plant life did likewise. HOW LUDICROUS.

We all know that plants can be changed by man, but the plants are already in existence and the grafting is deliberate. You try planting a tree cutting and getting it to grow as a flower or even a different tree species, which virtually IS what happened we are told by these evolutionists. Only God can make a tree, or anything for that matter.

A huge number of plant species are dependant on animals and insects for their propagation, in order to survive, how do the evolutionists explain that? I mean in the beginning, the timing would have had to have been spot on, so where did the calendars come from for this coordination. Which of these species took the initiative and wrote the first memo, spelling out the year, the season and the types of plants that would be required, when either the lifeforms emerged from the seas, or later when the animals, insects or birds decided to change themselves? Because if it was left to chance, then evolution could never have happened.

Imagine for a moment that bees or other similar insects have evolved very slowly over millions of years. How do you suppose that the plant life, (flowers and other pollinating plants) could possibly have timed their development to that of the insects? Understand that when `this' all happened, the individual species, either plant, animal or insect, was only just developing (evolution). If it were any other, it would have been (as it was) CREATION. So there must have been very few of each species, only those that mutated in fact.

Plants and animals don't talk, and assuming that by some freak event a few bees evolved at the same time as did some flower or pollinizing plant, HOW DID THEY FIND EACH OTHER IN TIME? They would have had to in order to survive, assuming that both males and females of both species had mutated at the same time that is, the bees requiring the nectar and the flowers requiring pollination. The earth is such a big place to a little bee and they might have evolved in one country and the flowers in another, what then? We wait a few more millions of years for the same freak happening? Multiply that same CHANCE happening by every species of life that there is on earth and you begin to realize the chances of evolution happening in the first place.

But perhaps we are supposed to ignore all of this and believe that although no seed could possibly have survived the tremendous heat of a `big bang' explosion and although there was no water, somehow grass and other vegetation grew and was waiting for these lifeforms when they emerged from the water.

Can someone please explain why they would want to leave the water in the first place? If we believe the evolutionists `fairy story', at all, the lifeforms must have had all that they needed in the water, otherwise they would not have survived, and to my knowledge only masochists enjoy pain and suffering. So why would they have decided to bring pain on themselves by trying to breathe air directly, by having to exert (and possibly cut and graze themselves) trying to slither or slide on land, and overcome inertia. And by trying to eat moss, lichen or grass, when they had been used to eating a kind of watery soup, -possibly damaging their insides ?

In all honesty no one in their right mind (and it's my belief that evolutionists are not in their right minds) could even begin to believe that that is what happened. Unless of course, one day they all received a government circular which said, `you must vacate your aquatic environment immediately, the grass needs cropping and there are plants out there waiting for you to emerge so that they also can evolve, and being the dutiful little lifeforms that they were they complied. To believe that they were able to change their aquatic eating habits, from eating watery soup and each other to somehow on emergence, becoming vegetarian, to the extent that they then ate solid vegetation, takes a bit of swallowing.

We are told the evolution process took millions of years to develop but are supposed to believe that the transition from meat eater to vegetation eater was almost instantaneous, think about it. These evolutionists want to start their story in the middle, not at the beginning, and then when someone challenges their fairy story they dream up theories involving millions of years, big bangs, missing links and other such nonsense. If you can reconcile all of this evolutionary nonsense, I certainly can't.

It's the same with people who believe in UFOs and aliens as being the reason behind life on earth, they also start their story in the middle, not at the beginning. Even if there are intelligent beings living in other galaxies, (and only God knows the truth of that) they also must have been created by God and the earth must have been in existence for them to land on in the first place. There is no way that THEY could have created anything other than their spaceship.

NOTHING CAN BE MADE FROM NOTHING, the solid matter, the elements, the water, the lifeforms, the plant life, the laws and LIFE itself, HAD TO BE CREATED, and had to be in existence before any form of evolving could take place. AND ALL OF THIS CAME ABOUT BECAUSE OF ALMIGHTY GOD AND HIS CREATION.

I do believe that because evolutionists talk in, millions of years, they think that in some vague way they have answers for all of the questions, it doesn't. It only serves to confuse themselves and all other people who do not think for themselves.

A method used by archeologists and scientists to date rocks etc. is known as the carbon dating method. By determining how much C14 remains in a once-living specimen, scientists say they can estimate (guess) how long ago the specimen died. As far as the carbon dating method is concerned, I saw a programme on TV where, using this method, a live yabby in water, was confirmed as being thousands of years old. The reason I mention this is, don't believe all you are told or read in newspapers, magazines etc. about evolution, missing links, millions of years etc.

***** I've had to come back to this part of the doc. to insert this little gem, from The Advertiser, 13th. July 91, page 3. It mentions the theft of a rare fossil, a `seapen', supposed to have lived about 600 million years ago. *****

The only thing that `millions of years' proves to me is the power and existence of Almighty God. That He has everything under control and has had for MILLIONS OF YEARS.

If you choose to ignore the truth of Almighty God and still believe in evolution then let us examine some other facts.

******************

Before going any further however I must say that I do believe in natural evolution, by that I mean the changes that take place in a species in order for them to survive because of natural disasters or climatic or other changes to their environment.

A species of white moth which was prevalent in southern England was released in the north of England and within a few years their colour had changed to that of grey mottled because they had ingested soot and grime, so that meant they blended in more easily against the sooted bark of trees. (brought about by industry and coal mining) Another example is that of some turtles stranded on a remote island where because of a lack of food the turtles had grazed the shrubbery to a certain height and in order to eat had to stretch their necks to reach the leaves at a higher level. After a few years the turtles born on the island were born with long necks.

This simply explains that it is possible for animals and humans (the Eskimos and the desert nomads) to adapt to their environment. The moths are still moths and the turtles are still turtles, and the changes happened within a few years, not millions. All that this shows is that life is adaptable it does not mean that that is how life came to be on earth, which is what evolutionists would have us believe. 

****************

Now what about some of the remarkable things that are supposed to have come about because of evolution? Plants are somehow supposed to have developed into the millions of species that we have to-day. They are supposed to have developed their own colours, their own leaf shapes, their own perfumes and smells, their own fruit and even developed osmosis and transpiration all on their own, how remarkable. Evolutionists would have us believe that some plants, such as orchids, have even mimicked the sexual organs of insects in order to attract them for pollination. Tell me pray, how are these plants supposed to have seen the organ which they mimicked, in the first place, and after viewing how on earth could they alter their own shape and colour to suit?

We also have a family of plants known as epiphytes, these plants survive by attaching, though not feeding, on other plants. They do not have roots they glue themselves, usually to trees and treeferns. How do you suppose they did this in the first place? I mean if everything evolved as we are told, it must have taken millions of years before trees appeared, so as well as the trees these epiphytes must also have created themselves. 
These plants (whatever they were before they became epiphytes) must have been growing patiently, in the ground complete with roots and feeding system, then one day they must have made the decision, let's do away with our roots (and therefore feeding) and let's glue ourselves instead and live off air, moisture and whatever happens to fall on us.

They might just as well have said let's change ourselves into birds then we can fly up there and then we can change back to being epiphytes after a few thousand years. It would seem that there are some highly intelligent plants, and there are some decidedly stupid people around, that's for sure.

********************

Animals have supposedly done some absolutely remarkable things also, more than we humans with all of our intelligence have ever accomplished. Do you, for instance, know how to make a battery, and do you know that electricity and water do not mix? No? Well I have news for you, electric eels, some catfishes and some rays do know how to make batteries and somehow insulate themselves against electric shock.

Somehow eons ago they must have decided that the best way they could kill their prey would be if they developed a battery within themselves. So they went to their nearest garage and asked instructions on what was needed and how to make one. "Well said the mechanic there are two kinds of batteries, `primary', which produce electricity by an irreversible chemical process but they are not rechargeable, and `secondary', which work on a reversible principle and can be recharged by connection to another suitable source of electrical current. To make a secondary type you will need some lead plates some sulphuric acid, distilled water and a plastic type case to house the parts. Oh! by the way you will need to charge it with electricity before use".

"Sorry said the South American eel, we don't have any of those parts and we don't have electricity either, we'll have to make our own. In any case, yours is not sophisticated enough for us, we want one that is entirely chemical, that does not need charging or re-charging and can deliver a shock of up to 880 volts, and the rays and catfishes want their own design as well. Oh! by the way what IS electricity"?

Once again we have a species less intelligent than we are, who without any prior knowledge of what they were about, supposedly produced within themselves incredible changes. I am certain that if man, with his knowledge and understanding of electricity, tried for the next 1,000,000 years to evolve a battery within himself, he could not.

After all, with all of his supposed intelligence, man hasn't even developed tolerance and understanding.

There are some 500 varieties of electric fishes, the African catfish can produce 350 volts. The giant electric ray of the North Atlantic puts out 50-ampere pulses of 60 volts, and as I have mentioned, the South American eel which can produce 800+ volts. Eleven different families of fishes are known to include species with electrical organs, and by the way, they use this electrical shock in water which kills their prey, and yet doesn't harm themselves.

What about fishes which live at incredible depths, and when they are brought to the surface they explode. Why would they even consider swimming down to those depths let alone live permanently down there, with those pressures and in total darkness, it does not add up. It could not be for food because all living organisms live off other living organisms, so if there was food at those lower depths how did it get there? No sunlight, total darkness, so it (the food) could not have been plant life as we know it and this primitive type of life (food) could not have had the structure (design) or strength to swim down there itself could it ? So what do they eat?

Added the following page on 4th Aug 92. I watched a programme on TV in Mar of this year, it was about exploration of the seabed at incredible depths. Searching for lifeforms and plant life. I learned that exploration carried out in the Pacific Ocean revealed both animal and plant life at a depth of 8,000 ft, that's 1.5 miles deep. The pressure at that depth is 38,000 tons per square inch, a pressure that would certainly crush all life as we know it on earth and in the shallower depths of the sea. The exploration vessel had to be specially constructed and re-enforced to go to those depths. Some of the life down there resembled fish and plant species similar to those that we know, crabs, shellfish, octopus etc., but there were some species that had never been seen before. Huge tubeworms with a RED flower like tip to their tubes, a YELLOW type marigold animal, and some fish which were PINK in colour; etc.

There are three questions that need to be answered here, and there is no way that any evolutionist can answer them.

1. How did the animals, fishes, and plant life get down there?
2. What do they use for food and how is it replenished?
3. How did the different species develop their colours and why?

There is no way that this life could have evolved and swum down there against those pressures, and how did the plant life get down there, it most certainly didn't swim. With no sunlight at all there could be no photosynthesis and therefore no plant life as we know it. That does not mean therefore, no plant life, but it does mean that there must be a law or laws in place to sustain the life cycle. Did these special laws create themselves? I think not. The most puzzling and important thing about all of this is the colour, how do you suppose these animals and fishes developed their colour, and what's more important why?

All of the life at those depths is living in total darkness and therefore the fishes and animals do not have eyes that function the same as those animals etc. on the earth's surface. They must in fact negotiate obstacles and each other using sonar or suchlike. They are in effect blind and therefore colour is of no use to them, so if they evolved how could they colourize themselves if they had never seen colour before and did not even know it existed? And this same argument applies to the very first species that supposedly evolved even though they were not blind.

So why do they have colour, and more important is, where did this colour come from, who thought of it and supplied it in the first place? The answer of course is, if we use our God given intelligence we will see and hear what Almighty God is telling us. They (the lifeforms) don't need the colour but God in His wisdom knew that one day this life would be found and to those who do have doubts it should now be obvious. ONLY ALMIGHTY GOD COULD HAVE CREATED THIS LIFE AND PLACED IT AT THOSE DEPTHS, AND GIVEN IT COLOUR.

This evolution nonsense is all too fairy storyish to be true, there is only one truth and that is CREATION.

Creatures have been found (according to naturalists) living inside active volcanoes, just above the red hot lava. Can we perhaps explain this by suggesting that because these creatures were feeling the cold they decided to move into warmer quarters? Think about what's involved here, these lifeforms supposedly emerged from water somewhere and then made their way to volcanoes, climbed down inside them to the very edge of the molten lava and decided that that was the place for them. HOW RIDICULOUS.

The temperature at that level is too hot for man, even with protective clothing, so how could these creatures have possibly adapted to such extremes, from cool water to tremendous heat? Or perhaps they also designed asbestos suits for themselves. And what about the supercharged steam and other gases, such as carbon dioxide, hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and sulphur dioxide, which continually escape from the surface of volcanos with violent explosions? Are we supposed to believe that these unprotected lifeforms could adapt to all of this when man with all of his knowledge, all of his intelligence and with protective clothing, can not ? Not that he would want to in the first place, so why would they want to in the first place? ALMIGHTY GOD placed them there so that we, if we used our intelligence, would become aware of His power.

Aren't evolutionists being just a little naive, aren't they in fact being extremely stupid to even THINK that such things are possible through evolution, and that because of misguided so called scientific thinking, WE (all people) are supposed to believe -that this is how life came to be on earth? Evolutionists believe in the kind of spontaneous miracles that supposedly evolved life and yet they disbelieve the miracles of Almighty God who created all things, both seen and unseen.

The old story of which came first the chicken or the egg, the sonar of bats, birds that can remove salt from sea water such as, gulls, pelicans, cormorants, albatross etc. None of these things could have evolved. Even if they had known what it was that they should develop within themselves, how could they have accomplished this, -with mind power?

These animals, birds, plants etc., DO NOT, and certainly as they were supposedly evolving, COULD NOT have had the intelligence to bring about these changes within themselves, when they did not even know what they were, let alone what they were supposed to become. HOW DO YOU MAKE SOMETHING OUT OF NOTHING?

I have not mentioned flight, how was this achieved? The mind boggles at the thought of some animal thinking about, and changing its own design to enable it to fly when it had nothing to copy from in the first place. There are many more instances that I could mention in relation to plants, animals, fishes, birds and insects, but the only explanation that can be given for their design, existence and place, is that Almighty God made all things and placed them where He chose, it is the only sane and logical explanation there is. 

All things on earth and in the universe are as Almighty God designed them, made them and placed them and that includes the stars, planets sun, moon and all of the laws that control them.

Gen 1:11 And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so. 
Gen 1:20 And God said, Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and fowl that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven.
Gen 1:24 And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so.
Gen 1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. KJV

Read all of Genesis and you will see for yourselves that only an all loving supreme being, Almighty God, could have CREATED everything.

Job 12:7 But ask now the beasts, and they shall teach thee; and the fowls of the air, and they shall tell thee:
Job 12:8 Or speak to the earth, and it shall teach thee: and the fishes of the sea shall declare unto thee. KJV

What I have learned is that there are some people who are deceived by Satan into believing that plants, insects, birds, animals, and man have evolved from nothing. These people can't possibly support this THEORY, cause that's what it is, just a theory, and that because they don't like the idea of someone superior to themselves, ALMIGHTY GOD, they embrace the idea of evolution.

Unfortunately for most of us a lot of `these people' are of the so called professional field. Scientists, astronomers, judges, lawyers, magistrates, solicitors, barristers, doctors, dentists, and I also include politicians. People who have a lot to do with the way we live our lives, people who make and are supposed to uphold the law (mans law) but as you and I know, make a very poor attempt at doing so. Why do they get it wrong? Because as I have mentioned before, evolutionists are deceived, their thinking is not right, so they become fools, (although they don't realize this) and fools can only practice foolish things, fools can only think foolish thoughts. Why else do you suppose the world is in the terrible, chaotic state it's in? We are controlled by fools who support and sustain each other.

Prov 12:15 The way of a fool is right in his own eyes: but he that hearkeneth unto counsel is wise.
Prov 15:2 The tongue of the wise useth knowledge aright: but the mouth of fools poureth out foolishness.
Prov 26:12 Seest thou a man wise in his own conceit? there is more hope of a fool than of him. KJV

Rom 1:18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;

Rom 1:19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath showed it unto them.
Rom 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
Rom 1:21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
Rom 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
Rom 1:23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.
Rom 1:24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:
Rom 1:25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen. KJV


****************

There is something else I must mention here and it's to do with the `big bang' theory and the foolishness of man. Astronomers and scientists who believe in the `big bang' theory tell us that since the `bang', the universe is continually expanding in all directions, because of centrifugal force. If that were the case the moon and the sun would be moving away from the earth and life as we know it could not exist, and yet after millions of years (according to evolutionists) this has not happened.

Now I'm sure you have all heard of `Halley's' comet which appears to us every 76 years, and has been recorded as far back as 240 BC. Halley's comet moves round the sun in a retrograde direction, which is opposite to the earth and the other planets. Are we to believe that the earth and all other planets were accidently sent spinning in one direction but this little snowball was spun in another direction? I don't think so. 

This comet with its fiery tail reappeared in 1986 and it was only then, as a result of a combined effort from a number of countries, that we NOW KNOW that the comet is similar in composition to a dirty snowball, and is approximately 5 miles by 7 miles in size.

Tell me, if this comet is being propelled by the gasses being ejected from its tail, which is what we are told, surely this snowball would have expended itself by now, and if not, where or how is it being replenished? Another thing that needs explaining is, how can something as small as Halley's comet turn against centrifugal force and come back on itself? And also after a journey of 38 years, and beginning its return journey, it would only have to be a fraction of a degree off course and surely we would not see Halley's comet again. It is a stated fact (according to astronomers) that some comets will never return to the solar system because their original orbits have been altered by the gravitational action of the planets.

Where did this gravitation and these orbits come from? Nothing! and that includes Laws can create itself / themselves.

Do you believe in all of this nonsense or do you believe the truth, ALMIGHTY GOD controls everything and keeps everything in its place. 

Job 26:7 He stretcheth out the north over the empty place, and hangeth the earth upon nothing.
Job 28:25 To make the weight for the winds; and he weigheth the waters by measure.
Job 28:26 When he made a decree for the rain, and a way for the lightning of the thunder:
Job 38:4 Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding.
Job 38:33 Knowest thou the ordinances of heaven? canst thou set the dominion thereof in the earth? KJV

If people really believed there is a supreme being who made everything, who controls everything, and makes everything possible, the world would be a much better place in which to live.

I would also like to say that nothing lasting or worthwhile was ever built on faulty foundations and if anyone thinks that it does not matter how life as we know it, began, then you are mistaken, it is very important. It is most unlikely that a person who believes in evolution will believe in Almighty God and it is my belief that because of the wrong teaching of evolution, the world is in the terrible state it is in today.

It's strange isn't it that evolutionists do not believe in a superior being with superior intelligence, but prefer to believe that they are descended from monkeys. Another point that should be mentioned is, a lot of people with wrong thinking try to substitute NATURE for God. Nature is just a word not a creator, it is the cycle that Almighty God brought into being to take care of the plant and animal `life cycles'.

In closing I would like to say that evolutionists, atheists, agnostics and everyone else who does not believe in God are fooling themselves. They choose to hide behind unprovable theories because in doing so they think they can, ignore Almighty God. The truth is of course that in accepting laws such as light, dark, heat, cooling, gravitation, orbital movement, flight, conversion, transfer, force, pressure etc.etc., which they do, then in reality they admit to the existence of ALMIGHTY GOD THE CREATOR.

I pray that Almighty God opens your eyes and mind to His truth.


Written by Richard W Hayes
3 Christie Avenue
Christies Beach
South Australia 5165
July 1991.

Updated 4th Aug 1992